Hearing you’re high risk for breast cancer is frightening. There is uncertainty as to what you should do about it – and you desperately want to do something. But taking the most drastic step of having both breasts removed is not the right choice for many women. It wasn’t for me.
I had no family history of breast cancer and would never have thought I was at risk until a routine mammogram showed a suspicious spot. A biopsy revealed that I had a precancerous condition that put me at high risk for getting breast cancer.
I thought my days were numbered. Adding to my concern was confusion about what this condition was and how it should be treated. Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a cancer “in place” that has no potential for spreading outside the breast unless it undergoes transformation. It is classsified as a “Stage 0” breast cancer but is not a true cancer because it lacks the potential to metastasize, or spread.
Now there is more certainty about what women with LCIS should do, but when I was diagnosed almost twenty years ago, the medical community was evenly divided on what to recommend. Around half the doctors surveyed for a study at the time said they would carefully monitor women with LCIS with regular check-ups and mammograms. The other half said they would advise LCIS patients to have both breasts removed.
A double mastectomy for a precancerous condition seemed extreme — since the treatment for invasive cancer was a lumpectomy or single mastectomy. LCIS indicates a potential for developing breast cancer in either breast, so to fully reduce the likelihood of breast cancer, both breasts have to be removed. But even with a double mastectomy, there is no guarantee you won’t get breast cancer.
I considered the bilateral mastectomy, but followed the recommendation of my wise and progressive breast surgeon to have careful follow-up. Now most doctors favor this approach, though many mention prophylactic mastectomy as an option because they have an obligation to communicate all possible treatments to their patients. That doesn’t mean the most drastic is the best, and according to the National Cancer Institute, prophylactic mastectomy is an overly aggressive treatment for women with LCIS and no other risk factors.
Now the women most likely to be grappling with the issue of having prophylactic bilateral mastectomy are those who have been diagnosed with a gene that causes susceptibility to breast cancer. Some are taking the initiative in deciding to have this surgery — and in many cases, they are ignoring the recommendation of their doctors.
And why shouldn’t they, you might ask. They are told their risk for getting breast cancer can be as high as 85%, and they are living with the uncertainty that breast cancer could strike at any time. Many have watched mothers or sisters struggle through surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. They understandably want no part of that.
But there are reasons they should not rush into having this surgery.
Some women with the gene will never get breast cancer. The risk of a woman with a susceptibility gene getting breast cancer at some point during her lifetime is 36% to 85%, as compared to a risk of 13.2% in the general population. The risk for women with the gene is often described as being “up to” 85%, but that number represents the worst case scenario.
These estimates of risk are not etched in stone. They are likely to change as scientists learn more about how these genes lead to breast cancer, just as ideas about LCIS changed. One group has already reported that the risk may be lower than currently believed.
Scientists are trying to understand why some women with the gene do not get breast cancer, and at some point, they may be able to predict who is at greatest risk and should consider prophylactic mastectomy.
Women who get bilateral mastectomy can still get breast cancer. The surgery reduces risk by 90%. but does not eliminate it. Breast tissue is spread out in the chest, and some remains after mastectomy.
There are less drastic ways to reduce breast cancer risk. Tamoxifen and Evista reduce breast cancer risk by around 50%. Some women can reduce their risk with a healthy lifestyle.
The risk of getting breast cancer increases with age, even in women with a susceptibility gene unless they had close relatives who got breast cancer when young. For women whose mother or sister didn’t get breast cancer until close to menopause, though, having breasts removed in their 20’s — as some women are doing — may be premature.
No surgery is free of risk and further surgery may be necessary. Women having mastectomies can develop infections or have bad reactions to drugs, just as with any surgery. Implants need to be replaced periodically.
Of course, a bilateral mastectomy may be the wisest choice for some women who have the gene, but it is too drastic a step for many others.